Kernel


Table of Contents

Linux Kernel Release Numbering Revisited 
Borrow foreign kernel-image 
grub menu.lst 
Kernel libs 
Kernel-image: 2.6-686 vs 2.6.8-2-686 
upgrade from kernel 2.4 to 2.6 
recently upgraded to 2.6.8 on sarge no eth0 
kernel-source and kernel-header? 
Prepare the Debian kernel-source 
Getting the kernel source 
Unpacking kernel sources 
Prepare the kernel 
Configuration File 
Configuring the kernel 
Compiling the kernel 
Prepare the Debian kernel-source, modversions.h 
Prepare the Debian kernel-source, modversions.h 
unresolved kernel symbols 

Linux Kernel Release Numbering Revisited 

http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/03/1624200&tid=156&tid=106

KernelTrap has a summary of a lengthy discussion on the Linux kernel mailing list, in which Linus Torvalds has suggested using an alternative numbering scheme for kernel development. The current 2.6 kernel has been different than older development trees, as active development has been happening at a rapid rate in the officially "stable" kernel, instead of forking the expected 2.7 "development branch" for this effort. In Linus' latest proposal, he suggests using the same odd and even arrangement where an odd number signifies a development release, and an even number signifies a stable release. The difference being that this will all happen under 2.6 and thus at a much more rapid rate. For example, the upcoming 2.6.12 release would focus on fixing bugs and thus be more stable, while the following 2.6.13 release would include new functionality and thus could be less stable.