Single file version available here.
Last updated on 2008-06-17.
To discuss, comment here.
| Next |
Table of Contents
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.distributions.grml.user Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:48:15 +0200
> I know grml can (re)generate fstab on boot each time. However, I'd like > to access my partitions by their names instead of sda7, sda12, which I > have no way to remember. So I have to disable the automatic fstab > generation on boot.
> I hope that grml can utilize the automount, as knopsis does, and use > udev to access them by their names, ie disk labels.
> The bonus is that USB drives will be taken care of as well by this.
> Would this happen in near future, or I'm out of luck and have to find > the way to do it myself.
Sorry, I don't understand your problem. :)
If you are using filesystem labels just mount them using:
mount -L $LABEL /mnt/test
If you need stable root devices you can use UUIDs as well: http://michael-prokop.at/blog/2006/08/11/stable-root-device-aka-uuid/
What do you mean with automount and "use udev to access them by their names"? What should /etc/fstab look like in your opinion? Did I miss what you are searching for? :)
> If GRML would build fstab with labels/UUIDs instead of device numbers, > it would probably satisfy the request. > > The change is desirable and easy. An OS is much more robust if it uses > labels/UUIDs. Device numbers could be appended in a comment (#).
yes, almost what I want. I just want one step more. not only mount them on demond, but automatically.
T
>> I know grml can (re)generate fstab on boot each time. However, I'd like >> to access my partitions by their names instead of sda7, sda12, which I >> have no way to remember. So I have to disable the automatic fstab >> generation on boot. > >> I hope that grml can utilize the automount, as knopsis does, and use >> udev to access them by their names, ie disk labels. > >> The bonus is that USB drives will be taken care of as well by this. > >> Would this happen in near future, or I'm out of luck and have to find >> the way to do it myself. > > Sorry, I don't understand your problem. :) > > If you are using filesystem labels just mount them using: > > mount -L $LABEL /mnt/test > > If you need stable root devices you can use UUIDs as well: > http://michael-prokop.at/blog/2006/08/11/stable-root-device-aka-uuid/[] > > What do you mean with automount and "use udev to access them by their > names"? What should /etc/fstab look like in your opinion? Did I miss > what you are searching for? :)
OK. Let me explain in detail.
I have many disk partions. One type is OS, so I have os11, os12, till os14. The other type is caches, eg, cache11, cache12 & cache13. Currently only my os12 is mounted, and all my caches are mounted.
Udev knows about all my disk labels:
$ ls /dev/disk/by-label/* | grep os /dev/disk/by-label/os12
$ ls /dev/disk/by-label/* | grep cache /dev/disk/by-label/cache11 /dev/disk/by-label/cache12 /dev/disk/by-label/cache13
Yes, you can use UUIDs to make stable root devices. But udev also allows using disk labels as well, beside UUIDs. To me this is an better option. It is intuitive, and as long as they are mounted correctly, I don't need to care about UUIDs.
In other words, I want to mount my HD/USB devices not by UUIDs but by labels. Eg. the disk partition labeled os12 would always mounted on /mnt/os12.
Instead of building HD partions into /etc/fstab, buit it into automount rules. So, whenever I cd into /mnt/os12, the disk partition labeled os12 is automatically mounted — all taken care of by automount.
It should be taken care of by pmount-hal. According to Florian Kulzer:
,----- | ... you will not need fstab entries for pluggable devices anymore. | Devices will be mounted at the correct mount point automatically. Even | better, if you use the "pmount-hal" command then the devices will be | mounted by their volume label so that you can address each medium | unambiguously and independent of the order in which you attached them. | This is also fully integrated in e.g. KDE and Gnome. `-----
These are all my researches finding so far.
T
> Now for the automount: > ======================
> Instead of building HD partions into /etc/fstab, buit it into automount > rules. So, whenever I cd into /mnt/os12, the disk partition labeled os12 > is automatically mounted -- all taken care of by automount.
No.
Automounting sucks. The automounting stuff at Knoppix (what you mention in another mail) was such annoying that I wanted to get rid of it completely. People using grml know what they are doing and what they want to do. Especially when rescuing systems you definitely don't want any automatizations on your filesystems. Oh and just try automounting with directory completion of the shell - anything but *not* amusing.
>> Now for USB pens: >> ================= > >> It should be taken care of by pmount-hal. According to Florian Kulzer: > >> ,----- >> | ... you will not need fstab entries for pluggable devices anymore. >> | Devices will be mounted at the correct mount point automatically. >> | Even better, if you use the "pmount-hal" command then the devices >> | will be mounted by their volume label so that you can address each >> | medium unambiguously and independent of the order in which you >> | attached them. This is also fully integrated in e.g. KDE and Gnome. >> `----- > > pmount-hal requires running dbus/hald. Not an option for the default > behaviour of grml for me at the moment. > > grml's udev solution for usb pens works for me. Just run 'mount > /mnt/external1' and usually that's it. Plain and simple. Mounting by > label is possible anyway and pmount-hal exists on grml too. What are > missing therefore? :)
The default behavior of the grml's udev solution for usb pens works for you but might not work for others. For example, I have 2 usb pens, one has no partition, so I can't use /mnt/external1; whereas the 2nd has 3 partitions, in which grml's solution is not enough.