Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
> I just don't get it how people keep creating logicals like this.
I disagree with you. Here is my partition table for one drive. I have windows and 4 distros of linux going just fine. The order is reversed and I did it with linux fdisk, much like he did with gpart. You will see that hda7 and hda8 are out of order.
> > delete partitions hda5 and hda6 , and recreate them in the right order. > > print the EXACT CHS values of these partitions on to a piece of paper. If > > you recreate them with these numbers (with hda5 and hda6 switched!) you > > won't even lose data. A typo is disastrous though. Therefor backup what > > you can before you begin this operation. > > yeah, I was wondering how can change the order back. which tool do you > recommend that can do this trick? I know using M$ tools will definately > wipe everything...
But linux fdisk variants will not run a mkfs, so use one of those So fdisk/cfdisk/sfdisk : whichever one you like the best, but don't forget to read manpages first if you don't know the programs yet.
> In the first example, the partitions 3 and 4 are overlapped. > In the second example, you have a native Linux logical in a > W95 extended- is this possible? >
It is possible to have any partitiontype inside any extended. (don't put another extended in though) Whether it's usable or not depends on the OS that reads the table. Putting a windows ID inside a linux extended is also possible. Linux won't care, windows wouldn't be able to find it though.
The overlap should not be possible, but poor partitioning programs exist. Normally you wouldn't be able to create such a table though.
documented on: 2001.01.08 Mon 13:36:59