Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
> how can I control whether to put the group of >commands in background by a variable. I.e, I wish I could do sth like >this: > > { cmd1; cmd2; ... ; cmdn ; } ${background_execution-'&'}
Well, it's not precisely what you're asking for, but how about the functionally similar:
{ cmd1; cmd2; ... ; cmdn ; } & case ${background_execution+set} in "") wait ;; esac
?
Or, if there is some subtlety which somehow makes that inappropriate, how about:
eval '{ cmd1; cmd2; ... ; cmdn ; } '${background_execution-&}
?
Ken Pizzini
>Anyway, >&2 seems to be working is sh. > >Because we say > >echo xxx > somewhere > >and we don't explitly say > >echo xxx 1> somewhere
You're correct. 1> and > are equivalent, whether they're followed by a filename or &<digit>, as are 0< and <. Michael saw the >& and didn't notice that it was part of sh's >&<digit> syntax, and jumped the gun on his criticism.
Barry Margolin
documented on: 07-14-99